Search Box

 

Latest Entries per Tag

My Top Tags

                                       

Calendar

««Jul 2008»»
SMTWTFS
   1234
5
678910
11
12
13141516171819
202122
23
242526
2728293031

Mailing List

My RSS Feeds








Frustrations with ContentProtect/ContentWatch Internet Filter

posted Friday, 17 September 2004

I am in day two of my most frustrating software experience to date. I made the mistake of believing the glowing review of ContentWatch's ContentProtect software provided at InternetFilterReviews.com. After I purchased and downloaded the software, I installed it and restarted my computer as directed. The ContentProctect window came up asking me to "select an account from the account list below," but it was empty, and the window allowed no action except to close it. The annoying window popped up frequently. Opening other files in the newly installed folder provided no useful information nor anything I could do to set up my account. Now the real problem: all Internet access was now prevented. I tried to uninstall the program, but it asked for an administrative password - no idea what that is supposed to be because that hadn't been set up yet. It didn't take any of the passwords I use, of course. So now I can't access the Internet, and can't delete the software. I call tech support, but they are only open until 5 PM Mountain Standard Time. I send e-mails to tech support and their Website asking for urgent help, and request they call me. No call comes. I call them again on Friday, but their is no answer. I later learn that they had some kind of power problem that shut down their 800 support. I later call a long-distance number to reach their Corporate offices and make contact with tech support. I am told that the only thing I can do is to hack into the software using lengthy instructions that they can e-mail or fax me. I have another computer I can use, fortunately, and get e-mailed directions.

The directions include a step of creating a desktop shortcut to cwhi.exe and then adding a string to the target field under properties. However, the new string for the target field is rejected by XP. When I clilck on "OK" or "apply" - after using exactly the string they told me to enter, XP forbids the action, telling me that it is not a valid entry. Naturally, by the time I realize that their instructions fail, it's after 5 PM Utah time (it's a Utah company) and tech support is gone until Monday. I try entering forms of the string using the cmd window to modify the execution of the program, but these don't work (checking by running "sporder" and noting that the "hook" is still present).

The problem was probably due to anti-spyware software that I did not deactivate before installing the program. My fault - but the darned software should not leave a user in such a state even if the install goes poorly. If nothing else, the user should be sent uninstall directions with the software in case of such problems - and the directions ought to work.

After all that fussing, I remembered that XP was a System Restore feature (Accessories>>System Tools>>System Restore) which allowed me to take the system back a few days (HURRAY!) and wipe out the nasty ContentWatch software. Maybe I'll even try the install again, but possible sources of interference turned off.

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. Jacques Dussault left...
Sunday, 30 January 2005 6:44 am

I used Content Watch popup for over a year. A couple wof weeks ago, an update was accepted and installed. Last week my computer was running slow. I found that the CPU was at 100% all the time. cwhi.exe, a file of Content Watch was always actived. I uninstall Content Watch and deleted all directories and remaining files of Content atch. That computer cannot log to internet since. The network connection is limited or disconnect. I am using my laptop since. Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks.


2. a reader left...
Sunday, 30 January 2005 8:41 pm

I just bought content watch and installed it on my kids computer. I followed the installation instructions and restarted my computer and guess what...I get to the start up screen where I select a user and when I click on the user, all I get is the user's background wallpaper, and no icons or any ability to do anything...I have restarted my machine several times (but pulling the power plug, as no other option is available) Windows Task Manager does come up, but the restart and shut down options do not work....Its sunday night and no tech support is available. I am also regretting this purchase!

David Comora


3. a reader left...
Saturday, 19 March 2005 4:01 am

Hi,
We have recently bought CW for our school filter, I am suprised to hear the lack of support from the comapny we are based in the UK and have had very good support from them replying to all e-mails and we have even spoke to them on the phone.I do hope this continues.

Cheers

John

John Cresswell


4. a reader left...
Thursday, 31 March 2005 1:08 pm

Do NOT Install this TRASH Software.

Even after uninstalling ContentProtect, I can't
access the internet at all, on any browser. I've
been troubleshooting it for several days.

ContentProtect is malicious TRASH. Do NOT Buy it,
or install it on your machine.

Bruce William Taylor [bwtaylor@yahoo.com]


5. a reader left...
Monday, 4 April 2005 1:37 am

Can anyone tell me on how to remove this software? I tryed it's own uninstall, rebooted but now I can't connect to the net because I get errors like "Contentwatch error, reinstall or uninstall". I surely can't uninstall it in any way because I just did and reinstall is not possible since they key can't be verifyed because the program itself is blocking Internet accsess!

I tryed pinging trough cmd and it worked just fine, so the connection works.

Ben


6. a reader left...
Thursday, 7 April 2005 8:12 am

I've had ContentProtect for over 18 months now. It's been pretty good over most of that time although recently the cwhi.exe task has been spinning it's wheels. Killing the process seems to fix the immediate problem although I don't know what the long term effects are.

Yes it's a bugger to uninstall but I supoose that comes with the territory. If it was easy to uninstall it would be a failure anyway.

There have been a few programs that I have that misbehave when WinXP's fast user swapping is engaged. You end up with multiple images of a program loaded at the same time for which the program does not always handle well.

Kerry


7. a reader left...
Tuesday, 26 April 2005 7:09 pm

ContentProtect has worked well for me, but this cwhi.exe thing slows the computer way down and I was monitoring the temperature of my CPU while cwhi.exe was running. Then just for the fun of it I went to the task manager and ended the cwhi process. My CPU went from 52 C to 40 C! I've made it a habit to turn it off and Content Protect still seems to run fine. Are we sure that cwhi has something to do with ContentProtect?

Cody


8. Simon left...
Monday, 4 July 2005 10:34 am

Found this thread which shows how to manually remove content protect from your system. Hope this helps...

http://forums.thatcomputerguy.us/index.php?showtopic=14152


9. Charles left...
Wednesday, 6 July 2005 11:35 am

All these problems are unfortunate, especially Mr. Lindsey's experience's.

I've had a few occasions where I've had to communicate with ContentWatch's tech support and it's always been a marvelous experience! They are generally very good at giving timely e-mail responses, and are very courteous over the phone.

When I’ve received their instructions via e-mail, yes, they can be lengthy. But the technicians are very good at making sure that anything you read from them will be as close to instruction over the phone as possible.

As was said in a few posts above, I have to agree with…if ContentProtect was easy to uninstall, or came with uninstall instructions (as Mr. Lindsey has suggested) it would be too easy to uninstall. The point of an Internet filter is so that it’s not easy to uninstall (at least for everyone, but the individual that installed it.) If manual uninstall instructions were included (like the instructions floating around the net) it would defeat the purpose of the filter, because anyone (including those that don’t like the filter) could uninstall it.

I’ve heard that ContentWatch tech support actually has a work around for the CWHI.EXE slowing down people’s Internet connection. If you contact them, they should be able to assist you in fixing the problem.

You can call (1-800-485-4008, Open Mon-Fri 8am-5pm Mountain Time ) or e-mail ContentWatch's customer support at support@contentwatch.com.


10. Jeff left...
Wednesday, 6 July 2005 1:21 pm

It really blows my mind why people have to complain over the Internet on blogs about software when they have an issue. They even ask how do I fix my issue in the blog without even attempting to contact Tech Support for the software that they are having an issue with. Who would be best to resolve a software issue, blog users or the tech support for the software? I think the answer is obvious. Tech Support is the best resource to resolve a software issue.


11. Doug left...
Saturday, 30 July 2005 7:45 am

I have been using content watch for over a year on both of my home computers. I had a little trouble when first installing the program and called tech support. They were helpful and got me going. Haven't had to call them since. The program works great for us and I've recommended it to a number of friends with kids. They also have it installed. We talk about this sometimes and no complaints from them.

I just found the cwhi.exe is slowing down my cpu on both computers and I am going to email tech support about this. Will see what they say.

Thanks to everyone for their posts. It is all helpful information.


12. Glenn left...
Thursday, 4 August 2005 10:23 pm

Just wasted 5 hours. Uninstalled contentProtect from my XP work machine and could not access the internet afterwards, despite being a registered subscriber and possessing all the passwords account info etc..I did not have a restore point to go back to so I had to restore from a system backup. contentProtect is now gone and internet is back. However, I have to now reinstall just about everything to get back to normal. Leson learned:- never install anything like contentProtect on a business machine - it slows the machine and can cause big downtime if problems occur. Not worth it.


13. Yuanlin Huang left...
Sunday, 7 August 2005 7:35 pm

Bought Content watch. Didn't find it useful. A few weeks ago, noticed my computer is really slow, and then outlook keeps "not responding". Just found today, cwhi.exe uses near 100% of my cpu all the time. Stop the process, things are back to normal.


14. Charles left...
Thursday, 1 September 2005 12:38 pm

•"Glenn made this comment, Just wasted 5 hours. Uninstalled contentProtect from my XP work machine and could not access the internet afterwards, despite being a registered subscriber and possessing all the passwords account info etc..I did not have a restore point to go back to so I had to restore from a system backup."

-Why would anyone think that if they had all the information for a software, this would be pertinant to a restore point? Not to be rude, but that's like saying "I've got the keys to my car, but my hood still won't open." If you have your keys, great, that doesn't mean that the keys will go to the front of the car for you, and flip the "switch" that is holding the hood down.

•"contentProtect is now gone and internet is back. However, I have to now reinstall just about everything to get back to normal."

-It doesn't sound like he called tech support to help him fix his problem. Like I said in my previous post, I have been in a jam with ContentProtect before, I was able to contact tech support, and they got me up and running, simple as that. Didn't need to rely on a resotre point. I didn't lose anything on my computer either.

•"Leson learned:- never install anything like contentProtect on a business machine - it slows the machine and can cause big downtime if problems occur. Not worth it. "

-The lesson learned here SHOULD be: if you have a problem, unless you know for definate that you can fix it, contact people that KNOW how to fix it. This should be common knowledge for everyone.

To say, "never install 'xyz' software", "Do NOT Install this TRASH Software." & "ContentProtect is malicious TRASH. Do NOT Buy it, or install it on your machine." These are not fair statements. Not everyone's computer is going to behave in the manner Glenn's and other's have described here on this blog. Don't discredit a software until you know you have done everything to fix the problem, which it doesn't sound like Glenn and others that have posted here have done.

It sounds like the negative posters here possibly thought they had just enough knowledge about Windows, they thought they could tackel the problem on their own, which is fine. But after using all your resources, then not calling tech support and bad-mouthing the software...that's just not good character. "Sour grapes" are never a mature way of handling anything.

In short, contact Tech Support when you have problems that you know you've no knowledge in, or cannot fix after all you've done.


15. Randy left...
Sunday, 4 September 2005 10:49 am

I have been using ContentProtect on 5 computers for the last couple of years after trying a series of parental control software (Cybersitter, Cybernanny, etc.) and ContentProtect still seems the best and least intrusive. As a few people on this site have found, it is important to follow the installation instructions carefully. I also have had cwhi.exe using 60%-100% of CPU resources and got around it by creating a dummy cwhi.exe file and replacing the existing one. After reading this blog I also sent an e-mail to tech support to see if there is a better fix.


16. Jack left...
Tuesday, 20 September 2005 9:41 am

Thanks to "thatcomputerguy" and this Blog. After Uninstall of ContentProtect I was unable to access Internet. The information on the website was NOT USEFUL. STAY AWAY !

Found this thread which shows how to manually remove content protect from your system. Hope this helps... http://forums.thatcomputerguy.us/index.php?showtop ic=14152

THANKS Search with Content Watch and you'll find the answer. I'm back on Internet .. Thanks a lot and I'll do a symbolic donation to "thatComputerguy".

Success


17. ANGRY CONSUMER left...
Thursday, 22 September 2005 2:35 pm

<i>Found this thread which shows how to manually remove content protect from your system.</i>

I can't believe you are going to participate, Jack, in giving complete uninstall information for a software that has security measure's set in place for a reason. You, and anyone else that makes insane posts like this are defeating the purpose for companies like ContentWatch to make software with security! Posts like this give horny teenager's the freedom of going behind their parents backs to break the security that's been put in place for a reason.


18. Enivid left...
Tuesday, 11 October 2005 11:06 am

Easy CWHI.exe fix: Click 'start' > 'run' and type in sporder and click 'enter'. In this box, there will be listings for CWHOOK's, MSAFD's, and RSVP's. There should be an entry called 'CWHOOK' with nothing else after it. That entry HAS to be at the bottom of the list. Highlight the last 'CWHOOK' entry and use the 'Down' button to move 'CWHOOK' to the bottom of the list. Close sporder and reboot your computer.


19. Al left...
Wednesday, 16 November 2005 11:33 am

Stay away. I've re-installed windows 3 times now. Program chunks are still there and harming my computer. Stay away!! Al


20. Al left...
Wednesday, 16 November 2005 11:33 am

Stay away. I've re-installed windows 3 times now. Program chunks are still there and harming my computer. Stay away!! Al


21. Charles left...
Wednesday, 30 November 2005 1:21 pm

Children, children, children, let's stop the bickering and quarreling. ContentWatch, Inc. has released version 2.0, and guess what, it doesn't have the CWHI.EXE file. There's your fix...just get ContentProtect 2.0, from: http://www.contentwatch.com/products/contentprotect.php?pid=10-2


22. Visitor left...
Wednesday, 30 November 2005 1:34 pm

I just tried that link and it says "File Not Found." Then I realized that for some reason the link changes.

If you put this into your browser: http://www.contentwatch.com/products/contentprotect.php?pid=10-2 for some reason the browser will add "%20" (http://www.contentwatch.com/products/contentprotec%20t.php?pid=10-2), just remove %20, and click "Go," or "Enter," and it will give you the page for ContentProtect 2.0

Just get 2.0 and this will solve everybody's frustration with the little CWHI.EXE file, because it's not in 2.0!


23. Russ left...
Thursday, 5 January 2006 3:23 pm

We've used Content Protect on one computer for over a year now with minimal if any problems. We just added a second computer to our account and have had the same problem as many of you, with the cwhi.exe file causing our CPU to be at 100%. We called the customer service, they were very helpful and friendly. It seems there was a problem with our anti-virus software (E-Trust EZ Anti-Virus) and Content Protect. He ran us through the uninstall of Content Protect, which was thoroughly explained. We then installed version 2.0 and everything is running perfectly. (We did disable the email scanning on our E-trust anit-virus software, but we didn't need that on anyway, so for us it was not a problem.) We are definitely fans of both the program and the customer service. If you are having trouble, definitely contact Content Watch's customer service.


24. Andrew left...
Saturday, 4 February 2006 7:15 pm

For people who are claiming that the reason it is hard to uninstall is because it is an Internet Filer doesn't make sense to me.

In order to uninstall the software you have to enter in the admin password. (Maybe the people who are making this comment don't actually have the software, but are just trying to be helpful - who knows.)

The point is this - if you have the admin password to be able to uninstall the software - this should be security enough! Because if you leave Content Watch installed, you can get to anywhere on the net with the admin password.

One other note - I went to this blog because someone said it had the steps to truly uninstall the software and actually be able to get to the net, but I don't see it. I will just email Content Watch.

The lesson I learned? Before installing software like this, first go to the web and see if others are having big problems with it like I am now with this software.

I was glad to learn this problem is just not my PC.

I finally uninstalled this software after about a year and half because my computer was sooooo slowwwwwww! It took forever just to get to the control panel and uninstall the thing, but as everyone knows here, I couldn't get to the Internet, but my pc was much faster.

I hope they provide a much better experience for newer users.


25. migo left...
Thursday, 16 February 2006 11:48 am

I really need to get something for my home wireless network with 5 kids. I was going to get contentprotect after reading the topten reviews but this blog and others have freaked me on that. Please recommend a product that works without destroying my systems. Thanks


26. Miko left...
Monday, 20 February 2006 5:40 pm

I've installed ContentProtect 2.0 on my 3 home computers (all conected wirelessly) and at my office (20 computers). Everything is working perfectly. I think they fixed all of these issues with their 2.0 product. I was refered to this site from a friend:

http://www.child-internet-safety.com/internet_filters.php They have contentProtect at a 25% discount there.


27. James left...
Thursday, 23 February 2006 9:28 am

For those who are having the cwhi.exe problem where it consumes your processing power, call up content protect and talk to customer service. They were able to help me fix it in about 30 seconds after I explained what it was doing.


28. ConcernedParent left...
Friday, 17 March 2006 9:52 am

I recently purchased and downloaded ContentProtect 2.1. After initial installation problems, which were quickly resolved by their support team, I was however disappointed to find the following:

ContentProtect cannot block any secure site. You cannot add a secure web site to it's list of blocked websites either. On the internet there are several free anonymous proxy servers, some of them with secure sites - going to one of these sites, it is therefore possible to surf the ENTIRE internet, without being blocked or picked up by ContentProtect.
This problem goes even further: like any good Parental Control software, you can disable web browsing during certain hours of the week. When the address for a secure proxy server is however entered, the software allows you to browse - regardless of the time of night or day! ContentProtect is therefore rendered COMLETELY useless for applying ANY filtering at all, if the user knows only one address of a secure anonymous proxy server (e.g. https://proxify.com)


29. Guest left...
Monday, 20 March 2006 11:55 pm

http://www.child-internet-safety.com/internet_filters.php (Internet Filter Review a.k.a HermanStreet) gives out bad CD's that are old and you have to contact ContentWatch support regardless.

From personal experience if you need to get a refund they are relentlessly frustrating and very difficult to work with, plus they charge a $5.00 "restocking" fee...only AFTER you have had ContentWatch support E-MAIL (they DO NOT have a phone number on their site) their support (Herman Street) all that has been done, only IF your problem cannot be resolved by ContentWatch Support.

Just get your ContentProtect filter from www.contentwatch.com, save yourself a headache.


30. dumkopf left...
Saturday, 1 April 2006 6:42 am

I too have used ContentWatch for about a year now, having paid $29.95 for it! I have discovered the problems that others here have reported. Now I can not remove it but have used a suggestion mentioned by someone above - creat a dummy file for cwhi.exe. Now if you don't know how to do that here is how:

Open NOTEPAD and enter the word: exit. Now save the file as cwhi.exe in C:\Program Files\ContentWatch and reboot your machine! Now the problem disappears, but the program skeleton is still in your machine. I will put it on the back burner for now and fix it right maybe later. It's a great temporary fix!


31. HappyCustomer left...
Wednesday, 12 April 2006 9:21 am

Good Product... Buy from www.child-internet-safety.com not from Internet Filter Review (aka Herman Street).


32. Concerned adult left...
Saturday, 15 April 2006 2:58 pm

ContentProtect is rendered completely useless if any of your kids knows the address of any secure proxy on the internet, e.g. https://proxify.com. ContentProtect does not even consider the allowable times set up if a secure website is accessed - giving anybody complete freedom to use the internet at ANY time, if they can get access to the PC. Secure sites cannot be added to the list of blocked sites either! I'm uninstalling it now, since it is of NO use now! I'll rather fork out money AGAIN for a different product that might give better results, even if it will only restrict internet surfing after certain hours!


33. Bob left...
Friday, 21 April 2006 3:30 pm :: http://contentwatch.com/support/faqs.php

CWHI: http://contentwatch.com/support/faqs.php#58


34. Dennis Lisonbee left...
Sunday, 23 April 2006 7:06 pm

I installed ContentProtect. It works well and fits our needs. However, makes some networking aspects of Windows unusable, such as network printing. As a result I had to take the software off my computer and am looking for another solution.


35. Dennis Lisonbee left...
Sunday, 23 April 2006 7:07 pm

I installed ContentProtect. It works well and fits our needs. However, makes some networking aspects of Windows unusable, such as network printing. As a result I had to take the software off my computer and am looking for another solution.


36. jcs left...
Sunday, 16 July 2006 11:56 pm

I installed content watch on my computer about 7 months ago. Content Watch needs to sell their product "in a box" rather than having to disable computer security and get a virus just to download the software. I have had to fully restore my computer TWICE because of trying to download content watch and am suspicious that the actual program has a virus. My third restore was successful and HP support told me not to download this software from the net. I took their advice and my computer works like new, now...Too bad I'm out $40.00 and still don't have internet filtering that is reliable. This company and others need to be held accountable for the millions of dollars they are taking and not helping people solve the problems that their program is causing. They advertise a product that supposedly protect us and our children from trash on the net, but does it really work, or is this just another money making cancer of greed business just like so many others!!!! Good idea, bad product. You couldn't give me this infectious software.


37. jcs left...
Sunday, 16 July 2006 11:58 pm

I installed content watch on my computer about 7 months ago. Content Watch needs to sell their product "in a box" rather than having to disable computer security and get a virus just to download the software. I have had to fully restore my computer TWICE because of trying to download content watch and am suspicious that the actual program has a virus. My third restore was successful and HP support told me not to download this software from the net. I took their advice and my computer works like new, now...Too bad I'm out $40.00 and still don't have internet filtering that is reliable. This company and others need to be held accountable for the millions of dollard they are taking and not helping people solve the problems that their program is causing. They advertise a product that supposedly protect us and our children from trash on the net, but does it really work, or is this just another money making cancer of greed business just like so many others!!!!


38. Stephen left...
Saturday, 12 August 2006 6:23 am

In re-reading the blogs about the problems associated with this program, I realize that one serious problem I had was related to ContentProtect. When I installed the trial program, it worked for a couple of days, so I thought that other problems that occurred were due to something else. I, and Geek Squad, both thought that I had a virus, but based on the similar descriptions of the problems described in this blog, the probelms were due to ContentProtect. I ended up with wallpaper and no task bar, and I had to completely re-image my hard drive. Fortunately, it was not difficult because of a couple of backup procedures I have. I would recommend avoiding ContentProtect and would only recommend it to people I did not like--perhaps the London terrorists--in order to wreak havoc upon their computer systems.


39. Joe-nobody left...
Monday, 21 August 2006 1:51 pm

Stephen,

What in the world is wrong with you? Did you call tech support? Did you even see if the people that are trained in fixing problems like this could fix it? Obviously not.

Why would anyone buy a car, a week later realize it can't start then just abandon the car? Any person with common sense would think to at least contact the dealer to see if they has heard of the problem, or at least have someone look at it.

In Stephens case, it sounds like he involved generic computer guy, instead of taking his problem to ContentWatch tech support, when he should have, as soon as he realized the problem.

Stephen says he's read these blogs and I have as well, and I've read multiple posts from people that keep telling everyone to go to tech support when problems arise...sounds like he really didn't read the posts on this blog. Or he just skimmed and didn't catch the ones that mention go to the tech support when there are problems.

Word of wisdom to you all, go to tech support when there are problems. Posts on blogs or other sites are not official support and could screw up your computer...real bad...go to tech support.


40. Concerned Adults? left...
Wednesday, 27 September 2006 4:43 pm

How concerned can "concerned adults/parents" really be if they are posting not only about the issues (such as secure websites) but are posting the addresses of these sites that render their product useless. Methinks that concerned adults are either a picnic short of a sandwich, or have ulterior motives - which, given their user names, betrays them as liars.


41. Laela's Dad left...
Saturday, 7 October 2006 6:52 am

I agree with the last comment but i will also say that it appears that from reading this blog that alot of folks are having problems with this software. Granted. Have any of them installed this software on a computer that thier child is going to use? Have they let the child try to do what children do on that computer on the internet and asked them for thier feedback? An adult's internet activity can be 40% more intensive than most childs. However our children are very smart and will pass information amongst each other on how to 'break into' something. Thats what children do. They have minds that are always 'curious' and if left alone on a computer to roam on or off the internet, they will figure things out faster than you would beleive. A child is prohibited from buying porn, alchohol and tobacco but guess what, they can go into a computer store and buy any book on 'hacking' the administrator account to how to bypass internet security. I will also like to finish by saying that your child is reading this blog.


42. babo left...
Friday, 13 October 2006 6:14 pm

Yes i installed the trial version and my laptop crashed. it became very slow to start and operate. it is winsock error and you can find a fix from here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/811259 I now never go for contentprotect. very very annoing program. I have no idea why PC magazine and others rrate the product as 'Good'. I would rate it as 'extremely bad'


43. Mark left...
Sunday, 15 October 2006 11:31 am

I have tried several web filter software programs and I honestly disagree with most of you. Nearly every one of these posts are not problems with Contentprotect, but problems with conflicting software on your system. This would occur regardless of the product you chose but is probably going to be more evident in a website filtering software. In addition, it doesn't follow the same simple uninstall mechanisms (which is by design, so your kids don't simply hit "next,next, next, uninstall" when they want to disable it.) as other programs. Below are some bullet points that you need to understand for the techincally challenged. Again, nearly ALL the comments above have nothing to do with Contentprotect but any web filter software. It's just the nature of the beast.

1) When you purhase the software from the VENDOR, not some 3rd party, --- www.contentwatch.com, it will ask you to create an admin password for uninstalling it. Simple solution: REMEMBER YOUR PASSWORD

2) "secure websites" cannot be filtered by the content that appears on it, regardless of whether you use netnanny, cybersitter, etc. period. "secure websites" uses Secure Socket connections (SSL) and are encrypted. The vendors all should keep lists of proxy filters in their web site blockers so they can't be reached.

3) Most of you are running other spyware, virus scanners, malware filters, etc. that can potentially break this program (i.e. spy doctor will detect it and remove it but leave it in a broken state). There is nothing that Contentprotect can do as they don't own the other vendors. I'm running AVG Malware 7.5 that doesn't have any conflicts with Contentprotect. I would highly recommend it if you are looking to run antivirus programs.


44. Mark left...
Sunday, 15 October 2006 11:35 am

my comment contiuned from previous post....

Lastly, I chose cyberprotect because it is the most accurate one I found --- it even locks down the search results in common web search engines. In addition, I like it be cause when I hit a bad site it actually tells me I was denied, rather then redirecting me to a broken link and it emails me, as a parent, when the event occured and has some AWESOME reporting.


45. Charles left...
Tuesday, 24 October 2006 2:10 pm

jcs says "Content Watch needs to sell their product "in a box" rather than having to disable computer security and get a virus just to download the software. I have had to fully restore my computer TWICE ...and HP support told me not to download this software from the net."

First of any boxed software you can find on a store shelf is getting harder and harder to find, because of costs to the company. If any company can save money from providing a little to no cost method of distribution, they'll do it. My point is for jcs that downloaded software is becoming the norm, if it's not already.

Oh, if I'm not mistaken, ContentProtect needs free access to contact the ContentWatch servers to verify your software registration key, just like Microsoft would. For a software to successfully contact anything on the net, during the instalation ALL secrutiy products, like a firewall and anti-virus need to be TURNED OFF.

Don't blame the design of a software for your fear of doing what's necessary. Also, I know for a fact that you'd need to disable your security software, regardless of an "in the box" version or a download version. The download version didn't give you a virus, nor will it kill you to turn off your security software for 2 minutes.

"Too bad I'm out $40.00 and still don't have internet filtering that is reliable. This company and others need to be held accountable for the millions of dollars they are taking and not helping people solve the problems that their program is causing."

Out $40.00??? Did you even check to see what the return policy is on this software package? It sure doesn't sound like it! The company needs to be held acocuntable for decisions that should be made before the software is installed??? What?! LOL

I'm human and I'm not perfect, but people, come on! Follow the installation prompts, which direct to turn off all security products!


46. Charles left...
Tuesday, 24 October 2006 2:11 pm

jcs says "Content Watch needs to sell their product "in a box" rather than having to disable computer security and get a virus just to download the software. I have had to fully restore my computer TWICE ...and HP support told me not to download this software from the net."

First of any boxed software you can find on a store shelf is getting harder and harder to find, because of costs to the company. If any company can save money from providing a little to no cost method of distribution, they'll do it. My point is for jcs that downloaded software is becoming the norm, if it's not already.

Oh, if I'm not mistaken, ContentProtect needs free access to contact the ContentWatch servers to verify your software registration key, just like Microsoft would. For a software to successfully contact anything on the net, during the instalation ALL secrutiy products, like a firewall and anti-virus need to be TURNED OFF.

Don't blame the design of a software for your fear of doing what's necessary. Also, I know for a fact that you'd need to disable your security software, regardless of an "in the box" version or a download version. The download version didn't give you a virus, nor will it kill you to turn off your security software for 2 minutes.

"Too bad I'm out $40.00 and still don't have internet filtering that is reliable. This company and others need to be held accountable for the millions of dollars they are taking and not helping people solve the problems that their program is causing."

Out $40.00??? Did you even check to see what the return policy is on this software package? It sure doesn't sound like it! The company needs to be held acocuntable for decisions that should be made before the software is installed??? What?! LOL

I'm human and I'm not perfect, but people, come on! Follow the installation prompts, which direct to turn off all security products!


47. Terry Rousseau left...
Thursday, 9 November 2006 7:56 pm

You people are nuts. I work for a software company doing phone support and while I understand hours of operation can be a hassel, there is no substitute for tech support. I have spent an hour on the phone fixing problems that would have taken 10 minutes to resolve if the users would have bothered to call when they first experienced problems. I know we want it fixed NOW, but in the real work NOW doesn't always happen. Sometimes we need to be contect with whenever, and enjoy the NOW. I want to buy this software, but i agree with another post, I want my software in a box.


48. John Halbur left...
Saturday, 18 November 2006 5:07 pm

I am considering buying ContentProtect. From reading these blogs, it sounds like there have been two common problems that some folks experience but others don't.

Problem # 1 is sluggishness caused by cwhi.exe. It sounds like this problem has been solved with version 2.0. Does anyone still experience sluggishness that is caused by version 2.0?

Problem # 2 is the complete loss of the internet connection, resulting in the need to uninstall the software, with some difficulty. Does anyone know what conditions lead to this 2nd problem? Does anyone know how to prevent it? If security software is disabled before installation (as instructed), will this assure trouble free installation?


49. Charles left...
Thursday, 14 December 2006 10:52 am

Whoa! Everyone, I found the coolest support for all of us to use, 24/7!

ContentWatch has a new blog full of support issue's and solutions, at http://cwra.blogspot.com!

Instead of people coming here to post a complaint about a negative experience, how about we try going to the new support blog to see if the problem has a solution on the blog!

Again it's http://cwra.blogspot.com


50. Guest left...
Monday, 19 February 2007 12:23 am

this is for anyone that thinks contentwatch is really a great product. think about this......i stopped using my pc one night...went to bed...

woke up in the morning, and found that content watch was installed onto my pc with out my consent. Now i can't get rid of it. and my pc is damaged.


51. Gaz left...
Saturday, 24 February 2007 6:12 pm

I am in Australia and purchased this software 2 days ago. I have never had such a terrible time. PRoblems are: No start menu No control panel Loss of critical system files Loss of audio/video No administrator processes Unable to drag and drop/copy or burn important files Noted many files changed in status to hidden and read only 5 minute boot up time and 5 minute shut down time Unable to reload windows COntentwatch error message in spite of programme deleted from computer

Can someone please help me? This program has ruined my brand new computer.

I have always run Spyware Doctor and Nod32 antivirus with no problems until I downloaded this software. I want my money back!

Gaz


52. gang lo left...
Thursday, 1 March 2007 7:51 am

i know the password that know one will know ill give it to yall hell im a good hacker i hacked yall computers


53. ann to GAZ left...
Sunday, 4 March 2007 10:44 pm

http://cwra.blogspot.com

-NOD32 If you installed ContentProtect after installing NOD32, please uninstall ContentProtect.

Before re-installing ContentProtect disable NOD32’s HTTP checking. If you are unsure as to how accomplish this please refer to the user guide or the tech support for NOD32. When the HTTP checking is disabled disable NOD32 and you can re-install ContentProtect.

If ContentProtect was installed before NOD32 and you are experiencing slowness with Internet browsing disable NOD32's HTTP checking. (If you are unsure as to how accomplish this please refer to the user guide or the tech support for NOD32.)


54. David left...
Saturday, 16 June 2007 3:52 pm

after installing this faulty program, I couldn't browse anything! I found this very simple repair for XP users...

Windows XP SP2 users can repair it by opening a Command window and entering netsh winsock reset. Restart your PC and Winsock should now be working again, although keep in mind that other Internet programs, such as firewalls, may need reinstalling.


55. David left...
Saturday, 16 June 2007 3:53 pm

Sorry, that should have been "after UNINSTALLING this faulty..."


56. Ben de Rivera left...
Wednesday, 20 June 2007 9:38 am

Ouch, that would be frustrating. I have a school computer, and it has ContentProtect on it.. It is... QUITE annoying. Wont lemme go to youtube, myspace, any good sites. Exept school site. If I could hack into this crap I definatly would. Any suggestions?


57. He who shall not be named left...
Wednesday, 25 July 2007 3:15 pm

-So "Guest" thinks that ContentWatch can install itself magically on to his computer...wow, um, does Santa Clause still magically fill your living room with gifts that came from thin air too? The answer to that question is: No, nothing comes from thin air, and ContentWatch didn't install itself magically. Someone did it while you weren't around. Perhaps someone feels they need to protect you from porn, or yourself?

-Gaz, please read other posts on this site...any site, first, because if you had you'd realize you need to contact ContentWatch technical support, not the "tech savy" computer guru's that also come here not knowing what the heck to do. If the tech savy can't figure it out, probably better go to tech support.

-Same goes to you David. And David how immature, unscrupulous, unprofessional, and plain rude can you get!!! You've now given every porn addicted male the key to getting through the software's security.

Just because you had a negative experience with the software doesn't give you the right to vent your frustration with ContentWatch, Inc, destroying their whole security method.

How about you let tech support decide who they should help assist getting the software off the computer, don't make that decision for them!!

I bet every parent and spouse who is trying to protect a loved one will be more than happy to blame you if the person they are trying to protect can't be protected anymore because you posted that little command. Posting that command, dumb move dude plain and simple.

This would be the same as if there were a tax exemption that free'd you from never needing to pay taxes again, that got leaked. If everyone took advantage of such a loophole the entire economy would implode...such as with giving away the loopholes of a security software. Yes, again, dumb thing to do. I cannot emphasize the level of ignorance this displays.

-As for Ben de Rivera, it's doing it's job: not letting you go to any site that school doesn't want you to! I guess it's a good thing Ben de Rivera doesn't pay attention, he'd have been able to figure out from David how to bypass ContentProtect.


58. jth left...
Friday, 7 September 2007 7:47 pm

I bought ContentProtect about 10 months ago, before its takeover by NN I believe. I too was convinced by the numerous reviews that indicated ContentProtect was the one to go for. Without going in to detail of my problems with the software, suffice to say they have been on-going (install, configuration, compatibility, ...).

I want to highlight a very interesting page that is in CP's FAQ pages. Please see http://www.contentwatch.com/kb/72. Here you'll see a bunch of AV/FW apps that the CP is not compatible with. These are not insignificant bits of software! What an attitude - "ContentProtect is not compatible with <av/fw software>, please uninstall it and you can install...". Fancy uninstalling such a critical bit of software as your AV or FW to install another type just because it's free! It was a good laugh if nothing else.

CP, how about this instead, "...we are working around the clock to resolve this issue and will have a patch available within the next few days. We apologize for the inconvenience..."


59. He who shall not be named left...
Wednesday, 19 September 2007 11:47 am :: http://thesystemworks.acnrep.com

Well, jth what would you rather do when a company knows it's own product doesn't work with a specific security product, suggest a FREE one that they know doesn't conflict or a security product you have to pay for, after you have just spend money on a security product??? Seems pretty obvious to me what the answer is here: FREE PRODUCT ALTERNATIVE.

I've read what you have quoted and obviously that is old documentation...no company can be perfect.


60. He who shall not be named left...
Thursday, 4 October 2007 4:18 pm :: http://thesystemworks.acnrep.com

Oh, and David, I don't consider myself technical, but through personal experience I know that using that little DOS command alone doesn't get rid of NetNanny/ContentProtect, you have to delete the ContentWatch folders too.

Well you can't delete the folders if the DOS Command has not been executed, and you cannot have the DOS command successfully if the folders haven't been deleted...wow what a nasty little cycle you've suggested people take.

One more thing has to be done before any deleting can be done, and because I'd had to walk through this exact process with tech support myself, I'll let everyone find out form Tech support what that one missing factor is that they need to do in order for that little DOS command to work.

In short, CALL TECH SUPPORT BEFORE DOING ANYTHING ON YOUR OWN!!! Man, this blog wouldn't have nearly 60 posts if people would go to tech support FIRST!


61. T0000009 left...
Tuesday, 19 February 2008 10:00 pm

As a Network Admin I can say this product is pretty bad. I just spent 4 hours cleaning this junk off a workstation. At least Symantic offers an "emergency" removal tool. I don't have time to wait for some unknown tech to send me the "secret" removal tool. What a load of junk.

If you want a real PRoduct for content filtering Use the D-Link DSD 150 Very easy to use and set up, no overhead and no damage to your OS. Don't use Content watch!!


62. He who shall not be named left...
Wednesday, 11 June 2008 3:43 pm :: http://cctayl.googlepages.com

Hey, you who posted comment #61... For starters don't you think you look pretty un-savvy with computers if you start off by telling everyone that you willingly spent 4 hours, AS A NETWORK ADMIN, tinkering around with something as simple as an internet filter? LOL

As a Network Admin, don't you usually want people to come to you first to get the problems fixed, instead of themselves trying to fix a problem themselves?

Technical Support is around for a reason. I know for a fact, based on my experience with ContentWatch support, that what the "Network Admin" described is something that probably could have been resolved in less than 15 minutes. Yes, ContentWatch support is that good...and they are even based in the U.S., in house at the corporate office! And they are all native english speakers!!

Sure hope everyone that reads this will learn from the experience of this "Network Admin" and go to the people that know what they are doing, BEFORE you screw the situation up worse by being a do-it-yourself person.